← Quick Find

When it comes to vaccines - why are people talking about 'Cost-benefit analysis' ?

Vaccinations are perceived as being riskier than the diseases themselves

People often have a distorted perception of the risk that they or others face from a disease. Specifically, people may perceive that the risk from a disease is low or inconsequential. This can motivate their belief that they don’t need a vaccine or that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits of vaccination. A misperception of disease risk has been found to be related to hesitant attitudes towards vaccination.

One of the reasons that people underestimate the risk from diseases is that vaccines have been so successful. It’s easy to misperceive that the risk from a preventable disease is low when few people, if any, suffer from that disease.

This theme frames the decision not to vaccinate as a calculated decision. However, the calculation is based on a distorted perception of:

  • The risk of disease.
  • The risk of vaccination.
  • The benefits of vaccination.

The disadvantages of vaccines are inflated and the benefits diminished, so that the cost-benefit analysis is skewed. People may also claim that their distorted perceptions are true and others are distorting the risks.

Ligger det någon sanning i det?

Since most people do not have regular contact with vaccine-preventable diseases, they may not fear these diseases. In countries like the UK, vaccines have had great success in lowering the incidence of some diseases that were highly threatening several decades ago, like measles. Under these conditions, the small risks of vaccination can seem more threatening, since they appear more certain than the risk of diseases that one does not have direct experience with.

Vad kan jag säga till någon som är fixerad vid denna övertygelse?

En dialog mellan patienter och hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal är mest produktiv om man förhåller sig empatiskt och ger patienten möjlighet att bekräfta de underliggande orsakerna till attityden, samt att man uttrycker förståelse för dessa. Därför är det viktigt att förstå attitydgrunden bakom personers uppenbara åsikter. Att bekräfta en persons underliggande attitydgrund innebär inte att vi måste instämma i detaljerna i deras argument. Vi kan till exempel bekräfta att:

Since most people do not have regular contact with vaccine-preventable diseases, they may not fear these diseases. In countries like the UK, vaccines have had great success in lowering the incidence of some diseases that were highly threatening several decades ago, like measles. Under these conditions, the small risks of vaccination can seem more threatening, since they appear more certain than the risk of diseases that one does not have direct experience with.



Efter att ha lagt grunden genom denna (partiella) bekräftelse kan vi gå vidare till att korrigera patientens särskilda missuppfattning.

A vaccine protects you against diseases and severe illness. In the worst case, disease can have fatal consequences and can lead to disability and death.

Vaccine recommendations in different countries are tailored to what the risk of disease is for that country. For example, the measles vaccine is recommended worldwide because the disease is very risky to everyone. Prior to the introduction of a vaccine, as recently as 1980, measles caused more than 2.6 million deaths globally. But the malaria vaccine would only be recommended for certain countries where the disease is a threat.

sv_SESwedish